Ha! Fair enough!
It was believable that Suri's talent plus her weasel behavior got her into this competition, and she may even have been a front runner without stealing Rarity's work.
And it should be fair enough, because why should YOU have a weaselly behavior in contests? Be sportsmanlike among the unsportsmanlike.
Of course, you know that! I'm just saying having good ethics as a dress-designer will make you a better person than Suri, even if you don't win.
Her winning? I doubt that.
I mean, come on. We're taking about Rarity losing this dress-making contest. I give my wholesome pride to Rarity's work! Even if she's not real. <-- joke, and if you highlighted this, you have sharp eyes!
Perhaps You'd have preferred a lower-stress episode without such an unethical character? They could have done that well, but I don't mind the episode we got at all.
I do not agree that she shouldn't have been in this episode...
Allow me to rephrase what I said about her existence, I tend to say it the wrong way although in my mind I mean it another way, usually.
I don't care how she met Rarity in the past, she could've been honest or deceitful about it. For that, we may never know, unless they made an episode about how they've met, which would be very unnecessary.
Or on the other point, how she greeted Rarity by saying her name first before even introducing herself.
Sounds self-controversial, but I still don't care.
I can only remember her saying Rarity's name first before she talked about their acquaintance from their filly days or something.
This debate has to stop. Can we just go with "This episode is great, no argument here!"?
Dear God Almighty, even if we both know that this episode was great, we just wanna debate or even argue about Suri lying about their relationship!
WHY DID WE DO THIS, WEESH, WHY!?!? xD